Ireland

​

1. Introduction​​

​

​This summary provides an in depth overview of Ireland’s transfer pricing framework, including its legal and regulatory background, key guiding laws, scope of application, documentation and methodological requirements, compliance measures, high risk industries and transactions, and anticipated future developments.

​

2. Legal and Regulatory Framework

​

2.1 Core Legislation and Regulations

​

Ireland’s transfer pricing regime is underpinned by a range of legislative instruments and administrative guidance:

• Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA 1997):

  • The primary legislation for transfer pricing in Ireland is contained in Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. This section outlines the legal requirements for transfer pricing, including the obligation for businesses to apply the arm's length principle to cross-border transactions between related entities.

• Transfer Pricing (Country-by-Country Reporting) Act 2019:

  • This Act introduced country-by-country reporting requirements in line with OECD guidelines and EU directives. It mandates that large multinational groups (with annual consolidated revenues exceeding €750 million) must provide tax and financial information on a country-by-country basis to the Irish tax authorities.

• The Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2011:

  • These regulations implement the provisions set out in Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. They establish the detailed rules for the application of transfer pricing in Ireland, including the arm's length principle and the methods for determining arm's length prices for intra-group transactions.

• Revenue Commissioners’ Guidance: The Irish Revenue issues technical guidance and detailed publications outlining how taxpayers should implement transfer pricing rules. These documents are regularly updated to reflect changes in OECD guidelines and BEPS recommendations.

 

2.2 Alignment with International Standards

​

Ireland’s transfer pricing rules are closely aligned with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations:

• Methodology and Documentation: The guidance encourages the use of internationally accepted methods to determine the arm’s length price and mandates comprehensive, contemporaneous documentation.

• BEPS Implementation: Ireland has integrated BEPS recommendations into its domestic legislation, ensuring greater transparency and consistent treatment of intragroup transactions.

• Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms such as Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs) are available to resolve disputes, thereby enhancing tax certainty for multinational enterprises.

• EU Directive 2016/881: This directive concerns the automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation, with a particular focus on country-by-country reporting. Ireland, as an EU member state, is bound by this directive, which is part of the legal framework governing transfer pricing documentation and reporting in the EU.

​​​

3. Scope and Application of Transfer Pricing Rules

​

3.1 Definition of Related Parties

​

In Ireland, the term related party is defined primarily under Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA 1997) and further clarified in the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2011. According to this legislation, a related party is generally an entity that has a relationship with another entity in a way that affects the terms of the transactions between them. Specifically, related parties are defined based on the control or influence one party has over the other. The criteria is further outlined below:​

• Control:

  • Direct or Indirect Control: One entity controls or is controlled by the other, either directly or indirectly. Control is typically defined as the ability to exercise influence over decisions, including management and financial policies.

  • More than 50% Control: A person or entity that directly or indirectly holds more than 50% of the voting power or shareholding in another entity is considered to have control over that entity.

• Influence:

  • Substantial Influence: One party has substantial influence over the other, even if it does not have outright control. This could include the ability to significantly affect decisions such as those regarding the financial or operating policies of another entity.

• Examples of Related Party Relationships:

  • Parent and Subsidiary: A parent company and its subsidiaries are always related parties.

  • Common Ownership: If two entities are both controlled by the same party or individual (e.g., through shared ownership of more than 50% of the voting shares), they are considered related parties.

  • Joint Ventures and Associates: Entities in which a party holds significant influence or joint control (e.g., joint ventures) are also considered related parties.

• Extended Relationships:

  • Family Relationships: For individuals, related parties may also include family members who are involved in business activities (e.g., spouses, children, and siblings of the controlling individual in a business).

  • Ownership Links: Entities that are part of the same group or have ownership stakes in each other beyond certain thresholds (often 25% or more) may be considered related parties.

• Entities under Common Control:

  • Entities that are under common control or have common decision-makers, such as a group of companies with the same owners or managers, are considered related parties.​​

 

3.2 Types of Transactions Covered

​

The rules cover a broad spectrum of intragroup transactions, including the following which are specifically mentioned under under Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 and the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2011,:

• Sales of Goods:

  • Transactions involving the sale of tangible goods between related parties are explicitly covered by the transfer pricing rules. The arm's length principle applies to ensure that the prices charged for the goods are in line with what would have been agreed upon between unrelated parties in similar circumstances.

• Provision of Services:

  • Intra-group services: The regulations cover both the provision and receipt of services between related entities. This includes both routine services (e.g., administrative, marketing, or technical services) and non-routine services. Transfer pricing rules require that the pricing for these services must reflect what would be charged by an independent service provider in a similar situation.

  • Cost Sharing: The rules apply to situations where related entities share the costs of services, ensuring that each entity contributes an appropriate share based on the benefit received.

• Intangible Assets:

  • The transfer pricing regulations specifically address transactions involving the transfer or licensing of intangible assets (such as intellectual property rights, trademarks, patents, or know-how) between related entities. The arm's length principle must be applied when determining the pricing for the use, transfer, or licensing of such intangible assets.

  • The regulations require that the price for these intangibles be set in a way that reflects what would be agreed upon between unrelated parties, considering factors such as the market value and the specific economic contributions of the parties involved.

• Financial Transactions:

  • Loans and Guarantees: The transfer pricing rules apply to financial transactions between related parties, including loans, financing arrangements, and guarantees. The interest rates on loans and the terms of these financial arrangements must be set at arm's length, reflecting what would have been agreed upon by independent entities under similar circumstances.

  • Treasury Services: If one entity within a group provides financing or treasury services to another entity, the terms and pricing of these services must also comply with the arm's length principle.

• Cost-Plus Arrangements:

  • The regulations apply to transactions where one related entity provides goods or services to another and charges a markup based on the costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The arm's length markup should be determined based on the functions performed, risks assumed, and assets used in the transaction.

• Commissionaire Arrangements:

  • In situations where one related entity acts as a commissionaire for another (i.e., facilitates sales or transactions without taking ownership of the goods), the transfer pricing rules apply to ensure that any commissions paid or received reflect an arm's length amount.

 

3.3 Exemptions and Simplifications

 

ITA  2011 provide certain exemptions from transfer pricing documentation and reporting requirements for specific types of taxpayers and transactions. These exemptions are aimed at reducing the compliance burden for smaller entities or specific situations where the risks of non-compliance or manipulation of transfer prices are minimal. These exemptions are detailed below, with a general documentation health waring.

​

• Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Exemption:

  • Section 835A(2)(c) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 exempts small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from the detailed transfer pricing documentation and reporting requirements, provided they meet certain criteria.

  • Specifically, a taxpayer is exempt if they meet two conditions:

    • The taxpayer's annual turnover is less than €250 million.

    • The aggregate value of the related-party transactions does not exceed €50 million in total (this threshold includes all intra-group transactions).

• Low-Value-Added Services:

  • The transfer pricing regulations allow simplified approaches for transactions involving low-value-adding services provided between related entities.

  • A low-value-added service is one that is incidental to the overall business activity and does not involve significant value creation, such as administrative, support, or back-office functions.

  • Such services may be subject to a simplified cost-based transfer pricing method, which may not require the same level of detailed documentation as more complex intercompany transactions.

  • Specific guidelines and simplifications can be applied for these services, as outlined in OECD guidelines.

• Domestic Transactions Exemption:

  • If the transactions are entirely domestic (i.e., all parties involved are located in Ireland), the transfer pricing rules may not apply in the same way as they would for cross-border transactions. However, the arm's length principle is still required for these transactions under general anti-avoidance rules.

  • While documentation may not be required for purely domestic transactions between related parties, taxpayers must still ensure that they are compliant with the fundamental arm's length principle.

• Group Relief and VAT Exemptions:

  • In certain circumstances, transactions that are part of group relief (where companies within the same group are exempt from tax on intra-group transfers) or transactions that fall under certain VAT exemptions may not be subject to transfer pricing documentation requirements.

  • These exemptions are based on specific conditions under tax law, where the transactions do not result in tax implications between the related entities.

• Certain Low-Risk Transactions:

  • The Irish tax authorities may allow for simplified documentation or exempt certain low-risk transactions (such as standard, routine intra-group sales of goods or services) from the full documentation requirements, especially where the transactions are clearly conducted at arm's length, and no tax advantage is sought.

​​

3.4 General Documentation Health Warning:

​

Even with these exemptions, it is important to note that basic documentation is still required in certain circumstances to demonstrate compliance with the arm's length principle. For instance, the Revenue Commissioners may request proof that intercompany transactions are consistent with market prices, especially in cases where the transactions involve high-value intangibles, loans, or significant financial arrangements.

​

4. The Arm’s Length Principle

​

Central to Ireland’s transfer pricing framework is the arm’s length principle, which requires that transactions between associated enterprises be priced as if the parties were unrelated. This ensures that profits are allocated based on economic substance rather than tax-driven considerations.

 

4.1 Determination of Arm’s Length Price

​

Taxpayers must apply one or more internationally accepted methods to establish the arm’s length price. Common methods include:

• Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method: Compares the price charged in a controlled transaction with the price charged in a comparable uncontrolled transaction.

• Cost Plus Method: Adds a markup to the cost incurred by the supplier to determine the price.

• Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM): Compares the net profit margins earned by the taxpayer in controlled transactions with those of independent entities.

• Resale Price Method: Establishes the arm’s length price based on the margin earned by a reseller when purchasing goods from a related party and selling them to an independent party.

• Profit Split Method: Allocates the combined profits from intercompany transactions based on the economic contributions of each party.

 

4.2 Comparability and Functional Analysis

​

A robust analysis is essential for selecting the appropriate method:

• Functional Analysis: Evaluates the functions performed, risks assumed, and assets employed by each party in the transaction.

• Economic Analysis: Considers market conditions, industry dynamics, and the specific economic environment.

• Contractual Analysis: Reviews the terms of the contracts between related parties, including payment terms and performance conditions.

​

5. Documentation and Disclosure Requirements

​

Comprehensive documentation is critical for demonstrating compliance with Irish transfer pricing rules. Taxpayers must maintain records that justify the pricing of intercompany transactions.

 

5.1 Key Documentation Elements

​

Irish taxpayers are required to prepare and retain:

• Master File: Provides a global overview of the multinational group’s organizational structure, business operations, transfer pricing policies, and overall allocation of income and risks. This file is generally required for groups exceeding certain revenue thresholds.

• Local File: Contains detailed, transaction specific information for the Irish entity, including functional analyses, detailed financial data, and the methods used to determine arm’s length prices.

• Country by Country (CbC) Report: For multinational groups meeting specified consolidated revenue thresholds, a CbC report must be prepared to disclose key financial and tax information for each jurisdiction in which the group operates.

 

5.2 Timing and Accessibility

​

​In Ireland, the deadline for transfer pricing documentation depends on the specific situation of the taxpayer, but generally, the documentation must be prepared and available by the filing deadline for the tax return for the relevant year.

​

• Annual Tax Return Deadline:

  • The transfer pricing documentation should be available and completed by the due date for filing the corporate tax return. For most Irish companies, the tax return (Form CT1) is due nine months after the end of the accounting period. For example:

    • If a company’s accounting year ends on December 31st, the tax return would typically be due by September 30th of the following year.

    • If the year-end is on March 31st, the filing deadline would be December 31st of the same year.

• Documentation Must Be Available on Request:

  • Although there is no formal requirement to submit the transfer pricing documentation directly with the tax return, it must be available to the Revenue Commissioners upon request.

  • The documentation must be kept and available for inspection for at least six years from the end of the accounting period to which it relates. This means that even after the tax return is filed, the documentation should be readily accessible if the tax authorities request it for review or audit purposes.

• Advance Pricing Agreements (APA):

  • If a company enters into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Revenue Commissioners, it may have an extended deadline for providing detailed transfer pricing documentation, depending on the terms of the agreement.

• Extensions for Filing:

  • If the company is granted an extension for filing its corporate tax return, the deadline for completing and making the transfer pricing documentation available would also be extended to the same new filing date.

• The CbC report is due within 12 months after the end of the reporting fiscal year of the multinational group.

  • For example, if the group’s financial year ends on December 31st, the CbC report would need to be submitted by December 31st of the following year.

 

5.3 Penalties for Non-Compliance

​

In Ireland, penalties for non-compliance with transfer pricing regulations are primarily governed by the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA 1997), as well as other related tax legislation. The penalties for failing to comply with transfer pricing documentation and reporting requirements can be significant and may include both financial penalties and interest on unpaid taxes.

​

Here are the key penalties that apply to transfer pricing non-compliance in Ireland:

​

• Penalties for Inaccurate or Insufficient Documentation:

  • If a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate transfer pricing documentation to support the arm's length nature of their transactions, the Revenue Commissioners (Ireland’s tax authority) can adjust the taxpayer’s profits.

  • Specifically, if the transfer prices between related parties are found to be not at arm's length, the tax authorities can recalculate the taxable profits of the entity to reflect arm's length pricing, which could result in additional tax liabilities.

• Penalty for Failure to Provide Documentation:

  • Under Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, if a taxpayer fails to provide documentation when requested by the Revenue Commissioners, the taxpayer may face a penalty of €3,000.

  • This penalty can be increased to €30,000 if the Revenue Commissioners need to make a formal request for the documents and the taxpayer continues to fail to comply.

• Failure to Maintain Records or Submit Documentation:

  • Failure to maintain proper transfer pricing documentation is considered a "serious offense" in the context of transfer pricing legislation. If the taxpayer is found to have intentionally failed to maintain records or provide the required documentation, they can be subject to additional penalties under general tax law.

  • Revenue assessments may be raised based on the correct arm's length price, and these assessments can result in back taxes, penalties, and interest on unpaid amounts.

• Interest on Unpaid Taxes:

  • If the transfer pricing adjustments result in additional tax liabilities, the taxpayer will be required to pay interest on the outstanding tax. The interest rate is typically charged on a daily basis and can be high. For 2025, the general interest rate for late payment of taxes is approximately 8% per annum, but it may be subject to periodic adjustments by the Revenue Commissioners.

• General Penalties for Tax Evasion or Fraud:

  • If a company is found to have deliberately evaded taxes through transfer pricing manipulation, such as inflating costs or shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions, the penalties can be much more severe.

  • The penalties for tax evasion or fraud include financial penalties up to 100% of the unpaid tax plus criminal prosecution in more serious cases, which could result in substantial fines or even imprisonment.

• Additional Penalties for Misstatements:

  • If a company misrepresents the facts or figures in its transfer pricing documentation, including overstating deductions or incorrectly applying transfer pricing methods, this can lead to a penalty of 10% to 100% of the tax underpaid.

  • In cases of deliberate and substantial misstatements, this penalty can be increased, and it may be accompanied by a 50% penalty on any additional tax due resulting from the misstatement.

• Late Filing Penalties:

  • If required transfer pricing documentation is not filed in a timely manner, or if there are delays in responding to requests for documentation by the Revenue Commissioners, a late filing penalty may be imposed.

  • Late filing penalties for tax returns and documents typically range from €100 to €1,000 per day, depending on the level of non-compliance.

• Summary of Potential Penalties for Non-Compliance:

  • Failure to provide documentation upon request: €3,000, increasing to €30,000 if a formal request is made.

  • Interest on unpaid taxes: Typically 8% per annum, but may vary.

  • Tax evasion or fraud: Penalties up to 100% of unpaid tax, and potential criminal prosecution.

  • Failure to maintain records: Penalty under general tax law, including potential tax adjustments.

  • Misstatement or misrepresentation: Penalties ranging from 10% to 100% of the unpaid tax.

 

These penalties highlight the importance of complying with transfer pricing regulations in Ireland, including maintaining appropriate documentation, ensuring that transactions are at arm's length, and responding promptly to requests from the Revenue Commissioners. Failure to do so can lead to substantial financial consequences and potential legal issues.

​​​​

6. Transfer Pricing Adjustments

​

In Ireland, transfer pricing adjustments can be made by the Revenue Commissioners if they determine that intercompany transactions are not conducted in accordance with the arm's length principle. The primary legislation governing transfer pricing adjustments is contained in Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 and the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2011:

​

• Recalculation of Taxable Profits: If the Revenue Commissioners determine that intercompany transactions do not reflect arm's length prices, they can adjust the taxable profits of the Irish entity to reflect the correct arm's length price.

• Adjustment of Deductions: The Revenue can adjust the deductible costs (such as interest or royalties) if these deductions are based on non-arm's length pricing, ensuring that the amounts paid reflect what would be agreed upon by independent entities.

• Correction of Losses: If transfer pricing results in artificially inflated tax losses, the Revenue can adjust these losses to align with the arm's length principle and prevent the misuse of tax-loss deductions.

• Reallocation of Income and Expenses: The Revenue Commissioners can reallocate income and expenses between related entities to better reflect the actual economic activity and value contributed by each party, ensuring the transactions are in line with the arm's length principle.

• Penalties for Non-Compliance: Penalties can be imposed if a company fails to comply with transfer pricing documentation requirements or engages in non-arm's length pricing to evade taxes. These penalties can include fines or additional taxes due to incorrect pricing.

• Adjustments in the Context of Double Taxation: If a transfer pricing adjustment results in double taxation (i.e., the same income is taxed in more than one jurisdiction), taxpayers can seek relief through the mutual agreement procedures (MAP) or the OECD arbitration process.

• Interest on Adjustments: Interest will generally be charged on any additional tax due as a result of the transfer pricing adjustment, typically at around 8% per annum (subject to change), calculated on a daily basis.

​​

7. Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs)​​

 

7.1 Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs)

​

In Ireland, Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) are governed by the OECD Guidelines on Transfer Pricing and the Irish Tax Legislation, specifically under Section 835A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 and the Transfer Pricing (Country-by-Country Reporting) Act 2019. An APA provides taxpayers with certainty about their transfer pricing arrangements by agreeing with the Revenue Commissioners in advance on the pricing methods used for intercompany transactions. The application process is summarized below:

​

• Request for Pre-Application Consultation: Before submitting a formal APA application, companies are encouraged to have an informal consultation with the Revenue Commissioners. This helps clarify the process and the likely outcome of the APA application.

• Formal APA Application: The formal application for an APA must be submitted in writing to the Revenue Commissioners. The application should include:

• A detailed description of the cross-border transactions to be covered by the APA.

• A functional analysis of the parties involved, detailing the functions, risks, and assets used in the transactions.

• The transfer pricing methods proposed to be used for the transactions, including any economic analysis or benchmarks supporting the method.

• Information about the taxpayer’s business activities, including group structure, financial performance, and details of the related entities.

• The application must be comprehensive and provide sufficient detail to allow the Revenue Commissioners to assess the transfer pricing arrangement and decide on the appropriate methodology.

 

7.2 Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs)

​

​In Ireland, the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) is a process designed to resolve tax disputes and double taxation issues that arise due to conflicting tax treatment of the same income or transactions between Ireland and another country. This process is available under Ireland’s Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs), which are signed with other jurisdictions, and is guided by the principles of the OECD Model Tax Convention and OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. To initiate a MAP process in Ireland, the below should be done:

​

• Filing a MAP Request: To initiate the MAP process in Ireland, the taxpayer must submit a formal MAP request to the Irish Revenue Commissioners. The request should include:

  • A detailed description of the disputed tax treatment or transfer pricing issue.

  • Information on the tax assessments or adjustments that led to the dispute.

  • Any relevant documentation supporting the taxpayer's position, such as transfer pricing reports, financial statements, and correspondence with the foreign tax authority.

• Time Limit: Under Irish tax law, the MAP request must typically be submitted within three years of the first notification of the tax assessment or adjustment that is causing the double taxation issue. This deadline is in line with the provisions of most Irish DTAs.

​ ​

8. Industries and Transactions with Higher Transfer Pricing Risk

​

Certain industries and transaction types present higher risks due to their inherent complexity and potential for profit shifting.

 

8.1 HighRisk Industries

​

• Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences:

  • Nature of Transactions: Involves R&D, licensing of intellectual property, and distribution agreements.

  • Risk Factors: High investment in innovation and difficulty in valuing intangibles demand detailed analysis and robust documentation.

• Technology and Digital Services:

  • Nature of Transactions: Licensing of software, digital platforms, and other intangible assets.

  • Risk Factors: Rapid innovation and the scarcity of comparable data make valuation challenging.

• Financial Services:

  • Nature of Transactions: Includes intragroup financing, guarantees, and other financial instruments.

  • Risk Factors: Accurate pricing to reflect market risk and credit risk is critical, with any mispricing potentially leading to significant adjustments.

• Manufacturing and Distribution:

  • Nature of Transactions: Involves multiple production stages and complex supply chains, requiring careful allocation of costs and margins.

  • Risk Factors: Complexity in cost allocations and intercompany dependencies demands thorough functional and comparability analyses.

 

8.2 HighRisk Transaction Types

​

• Intercompany Financing:

  • Key Considerations: Appropriate determination of interest rates, fees, and risk premiums for intragroup loans and guarantees.

  • Risk Factors: Volatile market conditions may lead to mispricing.

• Intangible Asset Transfers and Licensing:

  • Key Considerations: Accurate valuation of intellectual property and other intangibles.

  • Risk Factors: Rapid technological change and lack of direct comparables increase complexity.

• Service Agreements and Cost Sharing:

  • Key Considerations: Allocation of costs and benefits for shared services and centralized management functions.

  • Risk Factors: Requires detailed functional analysis to ensure that pricing is truly at arm’s length.

• Capital Asset Transactions:

  • Key Considerations: Transfers of significant fixed assets or equity interests require robust independent valuations.

  • Risk Factors: Misvaluation may have a material impact on taxable income and capital gains.

​​​​​

9. Challenges and Emerging Trends

​

9.1 Digital Economy and New Business Models

​

• Valuation of Digital Assets:
  Traditional valuation methods may require adaptation to accurately capture the value of digital assets and datadriven business models.

• Global Supply Chains:
  Increasing digitalization and globalization add complexity to establishing comparability and appropriately allocating income.

 

9.2 Evolving International Standards and BEPS Initiatives

​

• Integration of BEPS Measures:
  Ireland continues to integrate OECD BEPS recommendations into its transfer pricing framework, impacting documentation, adjustment mechanisms, and reporting requirements.

• Enhanced Transparency:
  Global initiatives toward greater tax transparency result in more detailed disclosure requirements and improved information sharing among tax authorities.

​​​

10. Future Outlook and Recommendations

​

10.1 Continuous Monitoring and Proactive Management

​

• Dedicated Transfer Pricing Teams:
  Establish specialized teams to monitor regulatory changes, market trends, and to ensure internal compliance.

• Regular Policy Updates:
  Continuously review and update transfer pricing policies to reflect current business operations and evolving regulatory requirements.

• Investment in Technology:
  Leverage advanced data analytics and IT systems to enhance benchmarking accuracy and streamline documentation processes.

 

10.2 Strengthening Engagement with Tax Authorities

​

• Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs):
  Engage early with the Irish Revenue to negotiate APAs and obtain clarity on the pricing of complex transactions.

• Utilize Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs):
  Actively participate in MAP processes to resolve crossborder disputes and to avoid double taxation.

 

10.3 Preparing for Heightened Regulatory Scrutiny

​

• Enhanced Documentation:
  Ensure that all transfer pricing documentation is comprehensive, uptodate, and aligned with both domestic requirements and international standards.

• Ongoing Training:
  Regularly update the expertise of personnel involved in transfer pricing to remain informed about evolving methodologies and regulatory expectations.

​​​